Review



matlab-generated dect spr  (MathWorks Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol MathWorks Inc is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    MathWorks Inc matlab-generated dect spr
    (A) shows the workflow for calculating the dual-energy computed tomography <t>(DECT)-based</t> dose distribution with the Varian DECT Eclipse scripting application programming interface (ESAPI) script. Plan optimization is performed using the single-energy computed tomography (SECT) image. (B) A sample readout tool of the DECT stopping-power ratio <t>(SPR)</t> using the DECT ESAPI script.
    Matlab Generated Dect Spr, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab-generated dect spr/product/MathWorks Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    matlab-generated dect spr - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Proton-Dose Calculation with Scripting and Modified Hounsfield Units"

    Article Title: Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Proton-Dose Calculation with Scripting and Modified Hounsfield Units

    Journal: International Journal of Particle Therapy

    doi: 10.14338/IJPT-20-00075.1

    (A) shows the workflow for calculating the dual-energy computed tomography (DECT)-based dose distribution with the Varian DECT Eclipse scripting application programming interface (ESAPI) script. Plan optimization is performed using the single-energy computed tomography (SECT) image. (B) A sample readout tool of the DECT stopping-power ratio (SPR) using the DECT ESAPI script.
    Figure Legend Snippet: (A) shows the workflow for calculating the dual-energy computed tomography (DECT)-based dose distribution with the Varian DECT Eclipse scripting application programming interface (ESAPI) script. Plan optimization is performed using the single-energy computed tomography (SECT) image. (B) A sample readout tool of the DECT stopping-power ratio (SPR) using the DECT ESAPI script.

    Techniques Used: Computed Tomography

    Stopping power ratio (SPR) residuals of dual- and single-energy computed tomography (DECT and SECT)-predicted SPR from reference values for the Gammex Phantom (A) and the Computerized Imaging Reference Systems (CIRS) Phantom (B). Effect of DECT SPR calculation on CIRS Phantom size (setup 1 versus 2) (C) and location of plugs (setup 2 versus 3) (D) within the full phantom. The SPR residuals using SECT and DECT are compared with measured SPRs of the CIRS phantom (E). Images of setups 1, 2, and 3 with the corresponding locations of the plugs circled in red (F).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Stopping power ratio (SPR) residuals of dual- and single-energy computed tomography (DECT and SECT)-predicted SPR from reference values for the Gammex Phantom (A) and the Computerized Imaging Reference Systems (CIRS) Phantom (B). Effect of DECT SPR calculation on CIRS Phantom size (setup 1 versus 2) (C) and location of plugs (setup 2 versus 3) (D) within the full phantom. The SPR residuals using SECT and DECT are compared with measured SPRs of the CIRS phantom (E). Images of setups 1, 2, and 3 with the corresponding locations of the plugs circled in red (F).

    Techniques Used: Computed Tomography, Imaging

    (A) Color map showing stopping power ratio (SPR) differences between dual- and single-energy computed tomography (DECT and SECT) for head and neck treatment. Blue (red) region shows higher (lower) DECT SPR compared with SECT. (B–D) Axial view of head and neck SECT dose (B), the corresponding forward calculated DECT dose (C), and the DECT-optimized dose (D). Yellow and blue target contours are clinical target volume (CTV) 6300 and CTV 5400, respectively. Organ-at-risk (OAR) contours for constrictors (green) and left submandibular (yellow) are shown.
    Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Color map showing stopping power ratio (SPR) differences between dual- and single-energy computed tomography (DECT and SECT) for head and neck treatment. Blue (red) region shows higher (lower) DECT SPR compared with SECT. (B–D) Axial view of head and neck SECT dose (B), the corresponding forward calculated DECT dose (C), and the DECT-optimized dose (D). Yellow and blue target contours are clinical target volume (CTV) 6300 and CTV 5400, respectively. Organ-at-risk (OAR) contours for constrictors (green) and left submandibular (yellow) are shown.

    Techniques Used: Computed Tomography

    (A) Dose-volume histogram (DVH) of clinical target volume (CTV) 6300, CTV 6000, and CTV 5400 for the single-energy computed tomography (SECT) versus the double-energy computed tomography (DECT) optimized plans. Solid lines are the nominal doses, whereas corresponding dotted lines are the worst-case scenarios. Sample DVH bands for the right parotid (B) and brainstem and mandible (C) are shown for SECT optimization versus DECT optimization. The DVH bands correspond to worst-case scenarios of a 3-mm shift and 3.5% (2%) range uncertainty for the SECT (DECT) plans.
    Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Dose-volume histogram (DVH) of clinical target volume (CTV) 6300, CTV 6000, and CTV 5400 for the single-energy computed tomography (SECT) versus the double-energy computed tomography (DECT) optimized plans. Solid lines are the nominal doses, whereas corresponding dotted lines are the worst-case scenarios. Sample DVH bands for the right parotid (B) and brainstem and mandible (C) are shown for SECT optimization versus DECT optimization. The DVH bands correspond to worst-case scenarios of a 3-mm shift and 3.5% (2%) range uncertainty for the SECT (DECT) plans.

    Techniques Used: Computed Tomography

    Comparison between absolute single-energy computed tomography (SECT) dose, double-energy computed tomography (DECT) dose, and DECT optimized (DECT_opt) plan dose.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Comparison between absolute single-energy computed tomography (SECT) dose, double-energy computed tomography (DECT) dose, and DECT optimized (DECT_opt) plan dose.

    Techniques Used: Comparison, Computed Tomography

    (A) Color map showing stopping power ratio (SPR) differences between dual- and single-energy computed tomography (DECT and SECT) for a patient with liver disease. Blue (red) region shows higher (lower) DECT SPR compared with SECT. (B and C) Comparison of SECT (B) and DECT (C) doses for the posterior oblique fields (red arrow) traversing through a region with dense lipiodol uptake in the liver. Beam overranging (red circle) can be seen in the DECT dose.
    Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Color map showing stopping power ratio (SPR) differences between dual- and single-energy computed tomography (DECT and SECT) for a patient with liver disease. Blue (red) region shows higher (lower) DECT SPR compared with SECT. (B and C) Comparison of SECT (B) and DECT (C) doses for the posterior oblique fields (red arrow) traversing through a region with dense lipiodol uptake in the liver. Beam overranging (red circle) can be seen in the DECT dose.

    Techniques Used: Computed Tomography, Comparison



    Similar Products

    matlab-generated dect spr  (MathWorks Inc)
    90
    MathWorks Inc matlab-generated dect spr
    (A) shows the workflow for calculating the dual-energy computed tomography <t>(DECT)-based</t> dose distribution with the Varian DECT Eclipse scripting application programming interface (ESAPI) script. Plan optimization is performed using the single-energy computed tomography (SECT) image. (B) A sample readout tool of the DECT stopping-power ratio <t>(SPR)</t> using the DECT ESAPI script.
    Matlab Generated Dect Spr, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab-generated dect spr/product/MathWorks Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    matlab-generated dect spr - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    (A) shows the workflow for calculating the dual-energy computed tomography (DECT)-based dose distribution with the Varian DECT Eclipse scripting application programming interface (ESAPI) script. Plan optimization is performed using the single-energy computed tomography (SECT) image. (B) A sample readout tool of the DECT stopping-power ratio (SPR) using the DECT ESAPI script.

    Journal: International Journal of Particle Therapy

    Article Title: Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Proton-Dose Calculation with Scripting and Modified Hounsfield Units

    doi: 10.14338/IJPT-20-00075.1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) shows the workflow for calculating the dual-energy computed tomography (DECT)-based dose distribution with the Varian DECT Eclipse scripting application programming interface (ESAPI) script. Plan optimization is performed using the single-energy computed tomography (SECT) image. (B) A sample readout tool of the DECT stopping-power ratio (SPR) using the DECT ESAPI script.

    Article Snippet: In a second workflow, the MATLAB-generated DECT SPR was used for plan optimization using RO parameters of 3-mm for setup and 2.0% for range uncertainty.

    Techniques: Computed Tomography

    Stopping power ratio (SPR) residuals of dual- and single-energy computed tomography (DECT and SECT)-predicted SPR from reference values for the Gammex Phantom (A) and the Computerized Imaging Reference Systems (CIRS) Phantom (B). Effect of DECT SPR calculation on CIRS Phantom size (setup 1 versus 2) (C) and location of plugs (setup 2 versus 3) (D) within the full phantom. The SPR residuals using SECT and DECT are compared with measured SPRs of the CIRS phantom (E). Images of setups 1, 2, and 3 with the corresponding locations of the plugs circled in red (F).

    Journal: International Journal of Particle Therapy

    Article Title: Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Proton-Dose Calculation with Scripting and Modified Hounsfield Units

    doi: 10.14338/IJPT-20-00075.1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Stopping power ratio (SPR) residuals of dual- and single-energy computed tomography (DECT and SECT)-predicted SPR from reference values for the Gammex Phantom (A) and the Computerized Imaging Reference Systems (CIRS) Phantom (B). Effect of DECT SPR calculation on CIRS Phantom size (setup 1 versus 2) (C) and location of plugs (setup 2 versus 3) (D) within the full phantom. The SPR residuals using SECT and DECT are compared with measured SPRs of the CIRS phantom (E). Images of setups 1, 2, and 3 with the corresponding locations of the plugs circled in red (F).

    Article Snippet: In a second workflow, the MATLAB-generated DECT SPR was used for plan optimization using RO parameters of 3-mm for setup and 2.0% for range uncertainty.

    Techniques: Computed Tomography, Imaging

    (A) Color map showing stopping power ratio (SPR) differences between dual- and single-energy computed tomography (DECT and SECT) for head and neck treatment. Blue (red) region shows higher (lower) DECT SPR compared with SECT. (B–D) Axial view of head and neck SECT dose (B), the corresponding forward calculated DECT dose (C), and the DECT-optimized dose (D). Yellow and blue target contours are clinical target volume (CTV) 6300 and CTV 5400, respectively. Organ-at-risk (OAR) contours for constrictors (green) and left submandibular (yellow) are shown.

    Journal: International Journal of Particle Therapy

    Article Title: Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Proton-Dose Calculation with Scripting and Modified Hounsfield Units

    doi: 10.14338/IJPT-20-00075.1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Color map showing stopping power ratio (SPR) differences between dual- and single-energy computed tomography (DECT and SECT) for head and neck treatment. Blue (red) region shows higher (lower) DECT SPR compared with SECT. (B–D) Axial view of head and neck SECT dose (B), the corresponding forward calculated DECT dose (C), and the DECT-optimized dose (D). Yellow and blue target contours are clinical target volume (CTV) 6300 and CTV 5400, respectively. Organ-at-risk (OAR) contours for constrictors (green) and left submandibular (yellow) are shown.

    Article Snippet: In a second workflow, the MATLAB-generated DECT SPR was used for plan optimization using RO parameters of 3-mm for setup and 2.0% for range uncertainty.

    Techniques: Computed Tomography

    (A) Dose-volume histogram (DVH) of clinical target volume (CTV) 6300, CTV 6000, and CTV 5400 for the single-energy computed tomography (SECT) versus the double-energy computed tomography (DECT) optimized plans. Solid lines are the nominal doses, whereas corresponding dotted lines are the worst-case scenarios. Sample DVH bands for the right parotid (B) and brainstem and mandible (C) are shown for SECT optimization versus DECT optimization. The DVH bands correspond to worst-case scenarios of a 3-mm shift and 3.5% (2%) range uncertainty for the SECT (DECT) plans.

    Journal: International Journal of Particle Therapy

    Article Title: Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Proton-Dose Calculation with Scripting and Modified Hounsfield Units

    doi: 10.14338/IJPT-20-00075.1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Dose-volume histogram (DVH) of clinical target volume (CTV) 6300, CTV 6000, and CTV 5400 for the single-energy computed tomography (SECT) versus the double-energy computed tomography (DECT) optimized plans. Solid lines are the nominal doses, whereas corresponding dotted lines are the worst-case scenarios. Sample DVH bands for the right parotid (B) and brainstem and mandible (C) are shown for SECT optimization versus DECT optimization. The DVH bands correspond to worst-case scenarios of a 3-mm shift and 3.5% (2%) range uncertainty for the SECT (DECT) plans.

    Article Snippet: In a second workflow, the MATLAB-generated DECT SPR was used for plan optimization using RO parameters of 3-mm for setup and 2.0% for range uncertainty.

    Techniques: Computed Tomography

    Comparison between absolute single-energy computed tomography (SECT) dose, double-energy computed tomography (DECT) dose, and DECT optimized (DECT_opt) plan dose.

    Journal: International Journal of Particle Therapy

    Article Title: Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Proton-Dose Calculation with Scripting and Modified Hounsfield Units

    doi: 10.14338/IJPT-20-00075.1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison between absolute single-energy computed tomography (SECT) dose, double-energy computed tomography (DECT) dose, and DECT optimized (DECT_opt) plan dose.

    Article Snippet: In a second workflow, the MATLAB-generated DECT SPR was used for plan optimization using RO parameters of 3-mm for setup and 2.0% for range uncertainty.

    Techniques: Comparison, Computed Tomography

    (A) Color map showing stopping power ratio (SPR) differences between dual- and single-energy computed tomography (DECT and SECT) for a patient with liver disease. Blue (red) region shows higher (lower) DECT SPR compared with SECT. (B and C) Comparison of SECT (B) and DECT (C) doses for the posterior oblique fields (red arrow) traversing through a region with dense lipiodol uptake in the liver. Beam overranging (red circle) can be seen in the DECT dose.

    Journal: International Journal of Particle Therapy

    Article Title: Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Proton-Dose Calculation with Scripting and Modified Hounsfield Units

    doi: 10.14338/IJPT-20-00075.1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Color map showing stopping power ratio (SPR) differences between dual- and single-energy computed tomography (DECT and SECT) for a patient with liver disease. Blue (red) region shows higher (lower) DECT SPR compared with SECT. (B and C) Comparison of SECT (B) and DECT (C) doses for the posterior oblique fields (red arrow) traversing through a region with dense lipiodol uptake in the liver. Beam overranging (red circle) can be seen in the DECT dose.

    Article Snippet: In a second workflow, the MATLAB-generated DECT SPR was used for plan optimization using RO parameters of 3-mm for setup and 2.0% for range uncertainty.

    Techniques: Computed Tomography, Comparison